Reading Responses:
I had read the text "Docile Bodies" by Foucault in my CART theory class last semester which I thought was very interesting, and we compared it to Deleuze's "Postscript on Control Societies". In Discipline and Punish, Foucault focuses on historical documents but his issues become relevant in modern day society. He exams the social mechanisms of change that occured in the prison systems where he challenges the idea of prisons are being a form of punishment. Similar to the Docile Bodies chapter, he focuses mainly on the body and power where the prison is a form of discipline like schools and hospitals. The system creates disciplinary environments to create none delinquents and a controlled body. In all, Foucault says that discipline creates "docile bodies", bodies that function in factories, military's and schools.
Following this idea, the "Panopticon" relates to Foucault's theory of a disciplined body by designing a prison where all prisoners are under surveillance without knowing when they are being watched. Jeremy Bentham created this with the idea of power in mind; cheaper prison with less staff, and the observer would have all the power. Foucault invoked the idea in his text by refering to the Panopticon as a metaphor for modern disciplinary societies where there focus is on observing and normalizing.
This text makes a good point when stating that the computer age tells no story, rather it is an accumulation of individual items with each the same significance. The author goes through the different types of digital storage medias and how the Internet constantly grows forming new links. Then he moves on to talking about a different kind of new media such as video games that follow no database logic, instead, they are ruled by another logic. Hence the term algorithm is introduced. This is where the player must execute an algorithm in order to win. All in all, computer culture does not have the same status as database and narrative. In some way, all new media objects are databases because they organize material on different levels.
Briefly, in response to this article,
We are use to being cradled by search engines but we forget that they are only tools and need us in order to function. "We perceive much of our world through [Google]", this statement is quite powerful and discouraging when we think people can't think for themselves. It is true that we never imagined artificial intelligence to look like Google where empires and nation-states use to be the evolving structural unit, except they were not being the center of human like perception. This text also refers to the first article about Jeremy Bentham's Panopticon design since it is a metaphor in digital surveillance but does not really suit an entity like Google. They are both two difference kinds of human surveillance. I do agree with the author of this article when he states: "Nor do I take much comfort in the thought that Google itself would have to be trusted never to link one’s sober adulthood to one’s wild youth, which surely the search engine, wielding as yet unimagined tools of transparency, eventually could and would do".